Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Family

Obviously, it is a very complex term. Families have overwhelming abilities to generate emotions, comfort, confusion and unwavering love. The most entertaining aspects about modern reality shows are fights and conflicts with spouses, children and siblings (The Kardashian's show, I'm embarrassed to know, thrives on such occasions). Jerry Springer's show about the worst kinds of betrayal and secrets between families is still on the air. Why is it so interesting or familiar to watch feuding families? Why is it normal to have to work so hard to get along with one's family? Unfortunately, family trouble seems to be the norm in modern American society.

Mine has generally been an exception. My family consists of a close-knit amalgamation of personalities, professions, interests and problems. We have lawyers, PhDs, businessmen, pharmacists, scientists, and entrepreneurs in our family. Needless to say, we don't always understand each other - but we love unconditionally as much as we can. We are extremely close and have had, historically, few problems among us. When I say family, I mean more than my immediate family of mom, dad, brother and me. My "family" includes all of my cousins, aunts, uncles, sisters-in-law, and nieces (and soon-to-be nephews). My male cousins are my brothers and I call them as such. We share our worries, defeats, successes and love of drinking (well, most of us). Many of us would vacation together or spend the summers in each others homes. And, as adults, we text, call, chat, and email constantly (again - well, most of us). I believe, as adults, we have generated a healthy admiration and respect for our differences.

Having grow up in this kind of environment, I thoroughly enjoy seeing my family. I find it foreign to think that others cringe at the thought of family dinners and Christmas parties, knowing that this of course happens often. Only in the last few years, when friends have commented on how fortunate I am to have such a tight-knit family, have I come to understand the rarity of a strong family. I'm lucky to think that coming together in times of difficulty is a natural thing. This week, some of my family members were faced with devastating news even though so many of them had worked very hard to prevent it. In that moment, the rest of my family members sent letters, flowers, missed calls, emails, texts and prayers without consulting their calendars or work deadlines. And while the recipients are grateful for this outpouring, it seems to me that this response should be expected by anyone.

I know that there are people who don't have a choice regarding their family situation (parents who've abandoned them or relatives who abuse things), but what of the ones that do? What about the cousins that you don't speak to because they don't live in your town or the aunts you don't visit because you never knew them in your youth? And, what about the relatives you had minor tiffs with (such as - who was Grandma X's favorite) Is it more important to be right than to be supported by loved ones? Why is it that pride often trumps togetherness? I know too many people who have not spoken to their mothers or fathers for 15+ years. And while they may very well have just cause for that - all I can think is - Seriously? What can that much distance possibly prove? What a monumental loss. I'm not asking people to forgive inflicted pain, turn towards mean people or overcome great abuse. I'm just saying that instead of being indifferent towards your distant relatives (who are otherwise pretty normal), take the time to extend a "How the hell are you these days?" once in a while. If they are anything like my family, it's totally worth it.

Any fun family stories to share?

Thursday, January 20, 2011

House

I began watching House MD a long time after it became popular in 2005. At first, I viewed it as just another medical drama and I really wasn't ready to think about a hospital without McSteamy. I happened to catch one of the episodes late in 2006 and now, I'm a convert. Dr. Gregory House is an abrasive, verbally witty, and rudely charismatic doctor in the department of Diagnostics. He too often collides with his team and too often dismisses the Dean of Medicine (his eventual love interest). I love House because of his verbal intelligence - he has the sharpest tongue in the business.

My favorite episode is "Three Stories" in which House tests the diagnostic caliber of med students by introducing them to three separate cases. A farmer, volleyball player and male golfer (who House initially envisions as Carmen Electra) are all experiencing various kinds of leg pain. As the students deduce the symptoms and attempt to diagnose the injuries, House's team reveals that the golfer is actually House himself. The episode makes the strongest claim for critics who state that House is yet another reincarnation of Sherlock Holmes. House and Holmes rely on their intellectual and logical reasoning skills, are addicted to narcotics, and hardly show emotion for their clients. Their names are quite related (as types of residences) and House's apt number is 221B (the same as Holmes' street address). Both men have a psuedo-friend figure and are intellectually superior to those around them.

Maybe I love House because of his wit and book smarts. Maybe I love House because he has grown a bit more humble (and sensitive) in recent years (the Season 6 premiere episode of House in a psychiatric ward was simply spectacular!). I might even love House because he is an ass. But I definitely appreciate the literary history that keeps weaving through my everyday life. It is no secret that Sherlock Holmes is one of the most celebrated detectives of all time. To include references to Holmes, more than a 100 years after his introduction, speaks to the persistent power of literature so interwoven into modern society that it seems casual, almost cliche. In my dissertation on South Asian crime fiction, I find it difficult to leave Holmes out of any chapter - buy why would I want to? I know that in the modern age of digital this and electronic that, many people have stopped reading books beyond Harry Potter and the Twilight Series. There is no doubt that references to these texts will be made well into the next millennium. And I also know that if I wish to make a case for the return of reading - no one (except perhaps the wonderfully geeky English lit friends I have) will really hear me and understand the long-lasting benefits to immersing oneself in a book. So, I say this: READ - if only to understand your TV (and the amazing Gregory House) better. =o)